Topic: Digital Art

Are there other digital artists out there who are tired of being labelled as photographers or "other"?  I DO NOT use photographs in my work, nor is it other.  It is digital.  I cycle electrons using a program to produce photons bouncing at your eyeballs.  I do not point and click a shutterbutton; please note, I am NOT putting down artists who digitize and re-work photos, that is hard work and needs talent to do well (as does any form of expression/art).  I was emailed recently by someone who was wondering where I got the base photos for my work and did not believe me when I told them there were none.  *sigh*  I am also an oil painter who paints straight from the brain/soulthingy, does that invalidate my work because I did not use a "real" object to paint from?

Re: Digital Art

Im Laughing. Im with you andartos. They are completely different crafts

Re: Digital Art

Hello. smile I am also a digital artist that has also worked in traditional mediums such as with oils and pencil/pencil crayon, but I work both from scratch as well and I digitally enhance photos. There is definitely a difference in my opinion. I have also been known to combine the two aspects as well.

I just joined this site and I'm taking in my new adventure. I see there is no category for "digital" art. I am assuming since most of my art now I create using a computer program, mostly Photoshop, I am to categorise under "graphic design" and "other" then? smile Not sure to do a "quick reply" or a "post reply" however.

Re: Digital Art

Artsie-Ladie,  sorry it took so long to respond. Honestly, I have not looked at the forums for awhile...
We should campaign for a new catagory!  But, what would we call it?  And how would we refer to ourselves?  Digital Art?  then everyone thinks we are photo-manipulators.  It could work in that a painter could work in gouche, tempera, oils, acrylics, all of them, one of them, a combo.
Any ideas?  I think I'm going to canvas on this.